WEBVTT

00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:05.730 align:middle line:90%


00:00:05.730 --> 00:00:10.320 align:middle line:84%
I choose what to publish
discussing with my supervisors

00:00:10.320 --> 00:00:12.420 align:middle line:90%
and my team.

00:00:12.420 --> 00:00:15.570 align:middle line:84%
I can see that also
there are some interests

00:00:15.570 --> 00:00:16.440 align:middle line:90%
of the community.

00:00:16.440 --> 00:00:19.650 align:middle line:84%
Reading the journals, I
can see where people are

00:00:19.650 --> 00:00:23.580 align:middle line:90%
trying to find some answers.

00:00:23.580 --> 00:00:27.180 align:middle line:84%
And it's interesting what to
publish because sometimes you

00:00:27.180 --> 00:00:31.840 align:middle line:84%
think that result is not
good, but if you publish even

00:00:31.840 --> 00:00:36.000 align:middle line:84%
the results and be
honest about the results,

00:00:36.000 --> 00:00:39.780 align:middle line:84%
maybe you're helping someone
not to go in the same path,

00:00:39.780 --> 00:00:42.090 align:middle line:90%
to do the same wrong things.

00:00:42.090 --> 00:00:44.430 align:middle line:84%
So choosing what
to publish, it's

00:00:44.430 --> 00:00:47.400 align:middle line:84%
something with my
supervisors and the community,

00:00:47.400 --> 00:00:49.170 align:middle line:84%
when I talk with them
in the conference,

00:00:49.170 --> 00:00:52.530 align:middle line:84%
my community of
research, they say.

00:00:52.530 --> 00:00:57.420 align:middle line:84%
And where to publish,
again, I rely very much

00:00:57.420 --> 00:01:00.210 align:middle line:90%
on my supervisor's opinion.

00:01:00.210 --> 00:01:03.630 align:middle line:84%
And the second, where
the people I'm citing,

00:01:03.630 --> 00:01:07.230 align:middle line:84%
the journals I'm citing,
usually there is a trend.

00:01:07.230 --> 00:01:09.330 align:middle line:84%
I can see the trend,
or that journal maybe

00:01:09.330 --> 00:01:13.650 align:middle line:90%
is where my community is.

00:01:13.650 --> 00:01:19.500 align:middle line:84%
And there was an occasion, that
I received an email, saying

00:01:19.500 --> 00:01:23.450 align:middle line:90%
that my research was very good.

00:01:23.450 --> 00:01:25.140 align:middle line:90%
It quite inflated my ego.

00:01:25.140 --> 00:01:29.550 align:middle line:84%
I said, oh my god, those people
already recognise my research.

00:01:29.550 --> 00:01:32.790 align:middle line:84%
And then I sent
to my supervisors.

00:01:32.790 --> 00:01:36.617 align:middle line:84%
They were asking for a paper,
to contribute in the journal.

00:01:36.617 --> 00:01:37.700 align:middle line:90%
I didn't know the journal.

00:01:37.700 --> 00:01:39.360 align:middle line:90%
I had never heard before.

00:01:39.360 --> 00:01:42.890 align:middle line:84%
And I sent to my supervisors and
they said, no, don't do that,

00:01:42.890 --> 00:01:45.570 align:middle line:84%
this probably a
predatory journal.

00:01:45.570 --> 00:01:50.610 align:middle line:84%
So I was quite
scared about that.

00:01:50.610 --> 00:01:52.540 align:middle line:84%
I haven't heard
about that before.

00:01:52.540 --> 00:01:55.630 align:middle line:84%
So it's good to rely on the
experience of the supervisors,

00:01:55.630 --> 00:01:56.130 align:middle line:90%
always.

00:01:56.130 --> 00:02:01.820 align:middle line:90%


00:02:01.820 --> 00:02:05.480 align:middle line:84%
My experience with
my first publication

00:02:05.480 --> 00:02:08.630 align:middle line:84%
was with a conference
publication.

00:02:08.630 --> 00:02:16.250 align:middle line:84%
So they are not rigorous as
they are with journal papers.

00:02:16.250 --> 00:02:19.760 align:middle line:84%
So when I started to
prepare, I sent it,

00:02:19.760 --> 00:02:22.760 align:middle line:84%
they asked me to
change some things,

00:02:22.760 --> 00:02:26.820 align:middle line:84%
and then they accepted
it at the end.

00:02:26.820 --> 00:02:31.370 align:middle line:84%
And when I started to prepare my
presentation to the conference,

00:02:31.370 --> 00:02:33.020 align:middle line:90%
I noticed an error.

00:02:33.020 --> 00:02:36.760 align:middle line:84%
In my opinion, it was a
big error, in the results,

00:02:36.760 --> 00:02:40.100 align:middle line:84%
and that the way I've
used the methodology

00:02:40.100 --> 00:02:41.840 align:middle line:90%
impacted the results.

00:02:41.840 --> 00:02:44.980 align:middle line:84%
So I was quite, what
to do now because now

00:02:44.980 --> 00:02:48.710 align:middle line:84%
the paper is issued, everybody
must have already seen it.

00:02:48.710 --> 00:02:50.900 align:middle line:84%
So I have to be honest
with the people that

00:02:50.900 --> 00:02:54.420 align:middle line:84%
are going to be there,
to see my presentation.

00:02:54.420 --> 00:03:02.310 align:middle line:84%
And so I've started the
conference presentation

00:03:02.310 --> 00:03:07.220 align:middle line:84%
with a slide saying there was
an error with the results,

00:03:07.220 --> 00:03:09.530 align:middle line:90%
and I'm going to explain what.

00:03:09.530 --> 00:03:13.250 align:middle line:84%
So it's a very risky,
but at the same time

00:03:13.250 --> 00:03:15.410 align:middle line:84%
it was very interesting
because people

00:03:15.410 --> 00:03:18.830 align:middle line:84%
were paying a lot of
attention, because lots of them

00:03:18.830 --> 00:03:21.110 align:middle line:84%
are using the same
methodology, and I

00:03:21.110 --> 00:03:24.240 align:middle line:84%
could see that there
were lots of questions,

00:03:24.240 --> 00:03:26.840 align:middle line:84%
because they started to
be concerned about if they

00:03:26.840 --> 00:03:30.070 align:middle line:90%
were doing the same problems.

00:03:30.070 --> 00:03:34.820 align:middle line:84%
And at the end, I asked the
people in the conference

00:03:34.820 --> 00:03:38.810 align:middle line:84%
if I could change the paper,
substitute for the right one,

00:03:38.810 --> 00:03:40.430 align:middle line:90%
and they accepted it.

00:03:40.430 --> 00:03:43.910 align:middle line:84%
So I tried to be honest
as much as possible

00:03:43.910 --> 00:03:47.740 align:middle line:84%
with the people in the
conference, the audience.